Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome Associated with a Pathogenic BRCA1 Variant: A Familial Case Series of Six Sisters

Document Type : Case Study

Authors

1 Gynecologist, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

2 Medical Genetic, karyoGen, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract
Background: Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) syndrome is most commonly associated with pathogenic variants in the BRCA1 gene and characterized by an increased lifetime risk of breast and ovarian cancers with variable penetrance. Familial case series provide valuable insights into genotype–phenotype correlations and the impact of preventive strategies.

Case Presentation: We report a family consisting of six sisters, four of whom were confirmed carriers of a pathogenic BRCA1 frameshift mutation (c.68_69del; p.Glu23ValfsTer17). Among the mutation carriers, two developed breast cancer, one developed ovarian cancer, and one developed both breast and ovarian cancer. The proband, a 44-year-old woman, was initially diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, followed by high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma two years later. She underwent partial mastectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, platinum-based chemotherapy, and is currently receiving maintenance therapy with olaparib. One BRCA1-positive sister underwent prophylactic gynecologic surgery and remains disease-free, while two sisters tested negative for the mutation and have no evidence of malignancy. A significant family history noted in a paternal aunt with early-onset breast cancer followed by ovarian cancer.

Discussion: This case series demonstrates the heterogeneous clinical expression of a single pathogenic BRCA1 mutation within one family, ranging from prophylactic surgery without malignancy to metachronous breast and ovarian cancers. The findings highlight the importance of cascade genetic testing, adherence to guideline-recommended surveillance, and timely risk-reducing interventions. Socioeconomic factors may influence access to preventive surgeries and considered in clinical decision-making.

Conclusion: This familial case series highlights the marked clinical heterogeneity of BRCA1-associated malignancies, even among individuals carrying the same pathogenic variant. The findings underscore the critical role of early genetic testing, cascade screening, and adherence to guideline-recommended surveillance and risk-reducing strategies.

Graphical Abstract

Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome Associated with a Pathogenic BRCA1 Variant: A Familial Case Series of Six Sisters

Keywords

Subjects

Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) syndrome, most commonly due to pathogenic variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, accounts for a significant proportion of familial breast and ovarian cancers.

Carriers of BRCA1 mutations have lifetime risks of up to 72% for breast cancer and 44% for ovarian cancer by age 80. Early identification of mutation carriers allows implementation of surveillance strategies, risk-reducing surgeries, and targeted therapies, such as PARP inhibitors. Familial case series provide insight into clinical heterogeneity, variable penetrance, and challenges in adherence to preventive recommendations. Here, we present a case series of six sisters from a single family with BRCA1-associated cancers, illustrating the spectrum of disease expression and management strategies. 

Case Presentation

Patient Cohort

The family consists of six sisters aged 34–52 years. Four sisters were found to carry a pathogenic BRCA1 frameshift mutation (c.68_69del; p. Glu23ValfsTer17), and two sisters tested negative.

  

Table 1. Clinical and Genetic Characteristics of the Six Sisters

Sister

Age (y)

BRCA Status

Breast Cancer

Ovarian Cancer

Surgical Interventions

Systemic Treatment

Current Status

Sister 1 (Parvaneh)

52

BRCA1 positive

No

Yes (2011)

TAH + BSO + staging

6 cycles chemotherapy

Disease-free; planning risk-reducing mastectomy

Sister 2 (Maryam)

49

BRCA negative

No

No

TAH (ovaries preserved)

None

Alive, disease-free

Sister 3 (Asieh – Proband)

44

BRCA1 positive

Yes (DCIS, 2022)

Yes (HGSC, 2024)

Partial mastectomy; TAH + BSO + staging

RT (25 sessions), Tamoxifen, 6 cycles Paclitaxel + Carboplatin ± Bevacizumab; maintenance Olaparib

No evidence of disease

Sister 4 (Atefeh)

41

BRCA1 positive

No

No

Prophylactic TAH + BSO

None

Disease-free; under breast surveillance

Sister 5 (Zahra)

37

BRCA negative

No

No

None

None

Alive, disease-free

Sister 6 (Elham)

34

BRCA positive

Yes

Not evaluated

Mastectomy with reconstruction

8 cycles chemotherapy

Alive; gynecologic evaluation pending

 Figure 1. Pathology of breast cancer in the proband’s sister

 Figure 2. Pathology of ovarian cancer in the proband's sister 

Figure 3. Pathology of Atefeh, the fourth sister who BRCA‑positive and has undergone prophylactic TAH‑BSO. 

Figure 4. Pathology of the sixth sister with breast cancer and a positive BRCA mutation. 

Pedigree Description

The family pedigree revealed an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern consistent with HBOC. The paternal aunt had early-onset breast cancer at age 30 during pregnancy, followed by ovarian cancer 3-4 years later, and was BRCA-positive. Among the sisters, the proband developed sequential breast and ovarian cancers; one BRCA-positive sister underwent prophylactic TAH-BSO and remains disease-free; two sisters are BRCA-negative and have no malignancy. Pedigree illustrates variable penetrance and expressivity of the BRCA1 mutation.

 

Genetic Analysis

NGS testing confirmed a heterozygous pathogenic BRCA1 frameshift mutation (NM_007294.4: c.68_69del; p. Glu23ValfsTer17) in four sisters. The mutation was validated via Sanger sequencing. This variant is known to significantly increase susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers. Cascade genetic testing was performed in available family members to guide surveillance and preventive strategies.

Figure 5. Summary of germline BRCA genetic testing results in two sisters from the same family. FIGURE5

 Discussion

Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) syndrome, most commonly caused by BRCA1 mutations, is associated with variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance. This case series demonstrates heterogeneous clinical manifestations, ranging from prophylactic surgery without malignancy to metachronous breast and ovarian cancers. Early identification of mutation carriers allowed targeted interventions, including surveillance, risk-reducing surgery, and PARP inhibitor therapy, which have shown to improve outcomes. Socioeconomic barriers delayed preventive interventions in some carriers, highlighting the importance of multidisciplinary support. The proband exemplifies dual primary malignancies, emphasizing adherence to NCCN guidelines for risk-reducing strategies and timely genetic counseling.

 Patient Perspective

The sisters shared their perspectives regarding genetic testing, cancer diagnosis, and preventive strategies. The proband, Asieh, emphasized her commitment to completing surveillance and maintenance therapy with olaparib after dual breast and ovarian cancers. Parvaneh expressed her intention to undergo a risk-reducing mastectomy. Atefeh highlighted financial constraints delaying her prophylactic breast surgery, while she maintains regular breast surveillance. Elham reported relief after completing breast surgery and chemotherapy but expressed concern regarding the evaluation and management of her ovaries. Maryam and Zahra, both BRCA-negative, valued genetic testing and continued regular monitoring. Collectively, the sisters underscored the importance of early genetic counseling, informed decision-making, and family support in managing hereditary cancer risk.

Figure 6. Histopathologic section of ovarian serous carcinoma (proband sister) showing complex papillary architecture with marked nuclear atypia and high mitotic activity (Hematoxylin and Eosin stain).

Conclusion

This familial case series highlights the marked clinical heterogeneity of BRCA1-associated malignancies, even among individuals carrying the same pathogenic variant. The findings underscore the critical role of early genetic testing, cascade screening, and adherence to guideline-recommended surveillance and risk-reducing strategies. Timely prophylactic interventions and personalized treatment approaches, including PARP inhibitor therapy, can significantly improve outcomes in high-risk families. Increased awareness and equitable access to preventive care remain essential components in the management of hereditary cancer syndromes.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest reported by the authors. 

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. 

Authors' Contributions

All authors contributed to data analysis, drafting, and revising of the paper and agreed to be responsible for all the aspects of this work.

References
[1] Kerr, S. M., Cowan, E., Klaric, L., Bell, C., O'Sullivan, D., Buchanan, D., Grzymski, J. J., van Hout, C. V., Tzoneva, G., Shuldiner, A. R., Wilson, J. F., & Miedzybrodzka, Z. (2023). Clinical case study meets population cohort: Identification of a BRCA1 pathogenic founder variant in Orcadians. European Journal of Human Genetics, *31*(5), 588–595.
[2] Agaoglu, N. B., & the writing group. (2022). Concurrent pathogenic variants of BRCA1, MUTYH and CHEK2 in a hereditary cancer family. Cancer Genetics, *268-269*, 38–43.
[3] Villy, M. C., & collaborators. (2021). Co-occurrence of germline BRCA1 and CDH1 pathogenic variants. Journal of Medical Genetics, *58*(6), 357–361.
[4] Frontiers in Oncology. (2025). Case report: Functional validation of a rare variant BRCA1 c.5193 + 2dupT in a family with cancer history. Frontiers in Oncology, *15*, 1623700.
[5] Gracia-Aznarez, F. J., & the research group. (2020). Founder BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 pathogenic variants in French-Canadian breast cancer cases and controls. Scientific Reports, *10*, 6491.
[7] Hu, C., & the CARRIERS Consortium. (2021). Breast cancer risk genes association analysis in more than 113,000 women. New England Journal of Medicine, *384*(5), 428–439.
[8] Kuchenbaecker, K. B., Hopper, J. L., Barnes, D. R., Phillips, K. A., Mooij, T. M., Roos-Blom, M. J., ... & BRCA1 and BRCA2 Cohort Consortium. (2017). Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA, *317*(23), 2402–2416.
[9] Breast Cancer Association Consortium. (2021). Polygenic risk scores for breast cancer risk prediction in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Nature Communications, *12*, 6383.
[10] Tischkowitz, M., & the screening working group. (2020). Population screening for inherited predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, *21*, 373–392.
[11] Grzymski, J. J., & the Healthy Nevada Project® team. (2022). Population-based penetrance of deleterious clinical variants. JAMA, *327*(4), 350–359.
[12] Manickam, K., & colleagues. (2018). Exome sequencing–based screening for BRCA1/2 expected pathogenic variants among adult biobank participants. JAMA Network Open, *1*(5), e182140.
[13] Domchek, S. M., & Robson, M. E. (2021). Update on genetic testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Clinical Cancer Research, *27*(14), 3807–3815.
[14] Tung, N., & Garber, J. E. (2022). BRCA1/2 testing: Therapeutic implications for breast cancer management. Journal of Clinical Oncology, *40*(16), 1802–1813.
[15] Maxwell, K. N., & the collaborating investigators. (2021). The clinical utility of polygenic risk scores for cancer risk prediction in BRCA1/2 carriers. Genetics in Medicine, *23*(8), 1461–1470.
[16] Rebbeck, T. R., & the consortium of investigators. (2020). Mutational spectrum in a global study of BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing. Human Mutation, *41*(12), 2071–2084.
[17] Parsons, M. T., & the ENIGMA consortium. (2020). Large-scale multifactorial likelihood analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance. American Journal of Human Genetics, *107*(4), 676–694.
[18] Cline, M. S., & the BRCA Challenge contributors. (2020). BRCA challenge: BRCA exchange as a global resource for variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2. PLoS Genetics, *14*(12), e1007752.
[19] Li, H., & the UK Biobank cardiometabolic working group. (2022). Analysis of rare genetic variation underlying cardiometabolic diseases and traits among 200,000 individuals in the UK Biobank. Nature Genetics, *54*, 240–250.
[20] Shirts, B. H., & the clinical validation team. (2022). Clinical validation of genomic functional screen data: Analysis of observed BRCA1 variants in an unselected population cohort. Human Genetics and Genomics Advances, *3*(2), 100086.