Journal of Advanced in Medicinal, Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Research (JAMPBR)

Preoperative Sarcopenia in Esophagectomy: Effects on Short-Term Surgical Complications, Anastomotic Leakage, and Hospital Stay

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Amin Kamyab 1
Hosein Shiri 2

1 Thoracic Surgery Assistant, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

10.5281/zenodo.22059783
Abstract
Introduction: Esophagectomy is a high-risk operation often complicated by postoperative morbidity, especially anastomotic leakage, pulmonary complications, and prolonged hospitalization. Because sarcopenia reflects reduced physiologic reserve and impaired recovery potential, it may help identify patients at greater risk for poor short-term outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of preoperative sarcopenia on short-term surgical complications, anastomotic leakage, and hospital stay.

Material and methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study included 75 adults undergoing elective esophagectomy at Imam Reza Hospital, Tabriz. Participants were recruited by convenience sampling. Preoperative sarcopenia was assessed using L3-level computed tomography to calculate the skeletal muscle index, and its associations with postoperative complications, anastomotic leakage, intensive care and hospital stay were evaluated using clinical and surgical data.

Results: Preoperative sarcopenia was associated with higher rates of overall complications, pulmonary complications, anastomotic leakage, surgical-site infection, atrial fibrillation, and 30-day readmission/mortality, as well as longer hospital and ICU stays. In adjusted analyses, sarcopenia remained an independent predictor of adverse outcomes, including overall complications (AOR 2.10, 95% CI 1.20–3.68; P=0.009), anastomotic leakage (AOR 2.35, 95% CI 1.01–5.47; P=0.047), pulmonary complications (AOR 2.80, 95% CI 1.40–5.60; P=0.003), major morbidity (AOR 2.65, 95% CI 1.30–5.40; P=0.007), and prolonged hospital stay (AOR 1.95, 95% CI 1.10–3.45; P=0.021).

Conclusion: Preoperative sarcopenia appears to be a clinically meaningful marker of poor short-term recovery after esophagectomy. Its association with increased postoperative complications and prolonged hospitalization supports routine preoperative muscle assessment to improve risk stratification and guide targeted perioperative optimization.

Graphical Abstract

Preoperative Sarcopenia in Esophagectomy: Effects on Short-Term Surgical Complications, Anastomotic Leakage, and Hospital Stay

Keywords

sarcopenia
esophagectomy
postoperative complications
hospital stay
Subjects
[1]                Baranov, N. S., Claassen, L., van Workum, F., van der Maas, J., & Rosman, C. (2022). Age and Charlson Comorbidity Index score are not independent risk factors for severe complications after curative esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A Dutch population-based cohort study. Surgical Oncology, *43*, 101789.
[2]                Baranov, N. S., van Workum, F., van der Maas, J., Kouwenhoven, E. A., van Det, M. J., & Rosman, C. (2019). The influence of age on complications and overall survival after Ivor Lewis totally minimally invasive esophagectomy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, *23*(7), 1293–1300.
[3]                Bausys, A., Mazeikaite, M., Bickaite, K., & Sileikis, A. (2022). The role of prehabilitation in modern esophagogastric cancer surgery: A comprehensive review. Cancers, *14*(9), 2096.
[4]                Berkelmans, G. H. K., Fransen, L. F. C., Dolmans-Zwartjes, A. C. P., Kouwenhoven, E. A., van Det, M. J., Nieuwenhuijzen, G. A. P., & Luyer, M. D. P. (2020). Direct oral feeding following minimally invasive esophagectomy (NUTRIENT II trial): An international, multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial. Annals of Surgery, *271*(1), 41–47.
[5]                Bosch, D. J., Muijs, C. T., Mul, V. E., Beukema, J. C., Hospers, G. A., Burgerhof, J. G., van der Jagt, E. J., & Plukker, J. T. (2014). Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on postoperative course after curative-intent transthoracic esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients. Annals of Surgical Oncology, *21*(2), 605–611.
[6]                Brinkman, D. J., Gupta, I., Matteucci, P. B., van der Horst, S., Räsänen, J., Mäkäräinen, E., Sihvo, E., & Ruurda, J. P. (2022). Splenic arterial neurovascular bundle stimulation in esophagectomy: A feasibility and safety prospective cohort study. Frontiers in Neuroscience, *16*, 1088628.
[7]                Chiu, C. H., Chang, W. Y., Yang, L. Y., Lu, C. H., Chung, C. K., & Chiu, S. C. (2025). Physical fitness predicts post-esophagectomy complications after chemoradiotherapy: A pilot study. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, *17*, 106.
[8]                Desborough, J. P. (2000). The stress response to trauma and surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia, *85*(1), 109–117.
[9]                Doganay, E., & Moorthy, K. (2019). Prehabilitation for esophagectomy. Journal of Thoracic Disease, *11*(Suppl. 5), S632–S638.
[10]             Fransen, L. F. C., & Luyer, M. D. P. (2019). Effects of improving outcomes after esophagectomy on the short- and long-term: A review of literature. Journal of Thoracic Disease, *11*(Suppl. 5), S845–S850.
[11]             Fransen, L. F. C., Verhoeven, R. H. A., Janssen, T. H. J. B., van Berge Henegouwen, M. I., Gisbertz, S. S., van der Peet, D. L., van Hillegersberg, R., Ruurda, J. P., & Luyer, M. D. P. (2023). The association between postoperative complications and long-term survival after esophagectomy: A multicenter cohort study. Diseases of the Esophagus, *36*(4), doac086.
[12]             González Santos, S., Martí Gelonch, L., González Jorrín, N., & Serrablo, A. (2024). Preoperative risk assessment and prehabilitation strategies in patients undergoing an esophagectomy for cancer resections: A single center retrospective analysis and a review of the literature. Frontiers in Anesthesiology, *3*, 1358847.
[13]             Grimminger, P. P., Goense, L., Gockel, I., van der Horst, S., Ruurda, J. P., & van Hillegersberg, R. (2018). Diagnosis, assessment, and management of surgical complications following esophagectomy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, *1434*(1), 254–273.
[14]             Grotenhuis, B. A., Wijnhoven, B. P., Grüne, F., van Bommel, J., Tilanus, H. W., & van Lanschot, J. J. (2010). Preoperative risk assessment and prevention of complications in patients with esophageal cancer. Journal of Surgical Oncology, *101*(3), 270–278.
[15]             Janssen, T. H. J. B., Fransen, L. F. C., Heesakkers, F. F. B. M., Dolmans-Zwartjes, A. C. P., van Berlo, C. L. H., van den Berg, J. W., & Luyer, M. D. P. (2022). Effect of a multimodal prehabilitation program on postoperative recovery and morbidity in patients undergoing a totally minimally invasive esophagectomy. Diseases of the Esophagus, *35*(3), doab082.
[16]             Klevebro, F., Lindblad, M., Johansson, J., Lundell, L., & Nilsson, M. (2016). Outcome of neoadjuvant therapies for cancer of the esophagus or gastro-esophageal junction based on a national data registry. British Journal of Surgery, *103*(13), 1864–1873.
[17]             Law, C., Bhimani, N., Mitchell, D., Chan, D., & Engel, A. (2023). The impact of age on the post-operative outcomes in patients undergoing resection for esophageal and gastric cancer. World Journal of Surgery, *47*(12), 3270–3280.
[18]             Levett, D. Z., & Grocott, M. P. (2015). Cardiopulmonary exercise testing for risk prediction in major abdominal surgery. Anesthesiology Clinics, *33*(1), 1–16.
[19]             Low, D. E., Kuppusamy, M. K., Alderson, D., Cecconello, I., Chang, A. C., Darling, G., Davies, A., D'Journo, X. B., Gisbertz, S. S., Griffin, S. M., Hardwick, R., Hoelscher, A., Hofstetter, W., Jobe, B., Kitagawa, Y., Law, S., Mariette, C., Maynard, N., Morse, C. R., ... & van Hillegersberg, R. (2019). Benchmarking complications associated with esophagectomy. Annals of Surgery, *269*(2), 291–298.
[20]             Makary, M. A., Segev, D. L., Pronovost, P. J., Syin, D., Bandeen-Roche, K., Patel, P., Takenaga, R., Devgan, L., Holzmueller, C. G., Tian, J., & Fried, L. P. (2010). Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, *210*(6), 901–908.
[21]             Markar, S., Gronnier, C., Duhamel, A., Mabrut, J. Y., Bail, J. P., Carrere, N., Lefevre, J. H., Brigand, C., Vaillant, J. C., Adham, M., Msika, S., Demartines, N., Nakadi, I. E., & Mariette, C. (2015). The impact of severe anastomotic leak on long-term survival and cancer recurrence after surgical resection for esophageal malignancy. Annals of Surgery, *262*(6), 972–980.
[22]             Minnella, E. M., Awasthi, R., Loiselle, S. E., Agnihotram, R. V., Ferri, L. E., & Carli, F. (2018). Effect of exercise and nutrition prehabilitation on functional capacity in esophagogastric cancer surgery: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surgery, *153*(12), 1081–1089.
[23]             Moorthy, K., & Wynter-Blyth, V. (2017). Prehabilitation in perioperative care. British Journal of Surgery, *104*(7), 802–803.
[24]             Pearse, R. M., Harrison, D. A., James, P., Watson, D., Hinds, C., Rhodes, A., Grounds, R. M., & Bennett, E. D. (2006). Identification and characterization of the high-risk surgical population in the United Kingdom. Critical Care, *10*(3), R81.
[25]             Schmidt, H. M., Gisbertz, S. S., Moons, J., Rouvelas, I., Kauppi, J., Brown, A., & van Hillegersberg, R. (2017). Defining benchmarks for transthoracic esophagectomy: A multicenter analysis of total minimally invasive esophagectomy in low-risk patients. Annals of Surgery, *266*(5), 814–821.
[26]             Shapiro, J., van Lanschot, J. J. B., Hulshof, M. C. C. M., van Hagen, P., van Berge Henegouwen, M. I., Wijnhoven, B. P. L., van Laarhoven, H. W. M., Nieuwenhuijzen, G. A. P., Hospers, G. A. P., Bonenkamp, J. J., Cuesta, M. A., Blaisse, R. J. B., Busch, O. R. C., ten Kate, F. J. W., Creemers, G. J., Punt, C. J. A., Plukker, J. T. M., Verheul, H. M. W., Bilgen, E. J. S., ... & van der Gaast, A. (2015). Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for esophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): Long-term results of a randomized controlled trial. The Lancet Oncology, *16*(9), 1090–1098.
[27]             Ubels, S., Klarenbeek, B., Verstegen, M., van Workum, F., Luyer, M. D. P., Nieuwenhuijzen, G. A. P., & Rosman, C. (2023). Predicting mortality in patients with anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: Development of a prediction model using data from the TENTACLE-Esophagus study. Diseases of the Esophagus, *36*(3), doac081.
[28]             van der Sluis, P. C., van der Horst, S., May, A. M., Schippers, C., Brosens, L. A. A., Joore, H. C. A., Kroese, C. C., & Ruurda, J. P. (2019). Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Surgery, *269*(4), 621–630.
[29]             van der Werf, L. R., Wijnhoven, B. P. L., Fransen, L. F. C., van Sandick, J. W., Nieuwenhuijzen, G. A. P., van der Sangen, M. J. C., & Lemmens, V. E. P. P. (2019). A national cohort study evaluating the association between short-term outcomes and long-term survival after esophageal and gastric cancer surgery. Annals of Surgery, *270*(5), 868–876.
[30]             van Hagen, P., Hulshof, M. C., van Lanschot, J. J., Steyerberg, E. W., van Berge Henegouwen, M. I., Wijnhoven, B. P., Richel, D. J., Nieuwenhuijzen, G. A., Hospers, G. A., Bonenkamp, J. J., Cuesta, M. A., Blaisse, R. J., Busch, O. R., ten Kate, F. J., Creemers, G. J., Punt, C. J., Plukker, J. T., Verheul, H. M., Spillenaar Bilgen, E. J., ... & van der Gaast, A. (2012). Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, *366*(22), 2074–2084.
[31]       van Workum, F., Slaman, A. E., van Berge Henegouwen, M. I., Gisbertz, S. S., Kouwenhoven, E. A., van Det, M. J., & Rosman, C. (2020). Propensity score-matched analysis comparing minimally invasive Ivor Lewis versus minimally invasive Mckeown esophagectomy. Annals of Surgery, *271*(1), 128–133.
Journal of Advanced in Medicinal, Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Research (JAMPBR)
Volume 2, Issue 6
November and December 2026
Pages 527-536

Home

Editorial Board

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us